About Us  |  About Cheetah®  |  Contact Us

Survey finds American workers spend an average of $3000 a year on coffee and lunch at work

American workers spend an alarmingly high amount of their hard earned cash on somewhat average daily expenses, according to a new Workonomix survey by Accounting Principals. The survey found that 50 percent of the American workforce spends approximately $1000 a year on coffee, or a weekly coffee habit of more than $20. And the spending doesn’t stop there. Two thirds (66 percent) of working Americans buy their lunch instead of packing it, costing them an average of $37 per week — nearly $2,000 a year.

Despite these high costs, the survey suggests workers are unclear about the biggest drain to their wallet. When asked which work expense they most want to be reimbursed for by their employer, 42 percent of employees chose commuting costs and only 11 percent chose lunch expenses. However, the average American’s commuting cost is $123 a month or approximately $1500 a year, which is well below the average annual lunch tab of $2000.

“Small — but consistent — expenses add up quickly over time, and it can be difficult for consumers to realize it because they’re only spending a few dollars at a time. But, as our survey shows, those few dollars can quickly turn into a few thousand dollars,” said Jodi Chavez, senior vice president, Accounting Principals. “Additionally, when you look at it over a worker’s lifetime, that number grows exponentially. Consider the average American who works for about 40 years, starting their first job around age 22. By the time they retire at age 62 they would have spent at minimum $120,000 on coffee and lunch, not including inflation.”

This is especially true for young American workers. The survey found that younger professionals (ages 18-34) spend almost twice as much on coffee during the week than those ages 45+ ($24.74 vs. $14.15, respectively). They also shell out more for lunch, spending an average of $44.78 per week on lunch compared to their older colleagues who spend $31.80 per week. However, it seems American workers of all ages are starting to realize the effect this incremental spending has on their personal bottom line. According to the survey, one-third (35 percent) of employees have made it a financial goal to bring lunch instead of buying it in 2012.

Other survey findings include:

  • Better food and coffee in the office might help cut back personal spending. Perhaps because of how much they’re spending outside the office, American workers would like companies to invest in better food and drinks in the office. One-quarter (25 percent) of Americans wish their company would invest in better vending machine snacks and 22 percent of American workers would like their company to invest in better coffee in the office.
  • Employers should focus on the “simple pleasures” to keep employees happy. Although better food and drinks would be a plus, employees most want to see their companies invest in better office equipment (46 percent) and more comfortable office chairs (32 percent) in 2012.
  • Corporate discounts do not factor into employees’ purchase decisions. Companies looking to attract new candidates shouldn’t focus on corporate discounts as a selling point. The majority (82 percent) of employees say corporate discounts matter little or not at all when buying a new product or service.

“As the recovery gains momentum and companies look to attract and retain talent, they should consider worrying less about big-ticket discounts and focus instead on what will impact their employees’ happiness every day,” said Chavez. “Small improvements around the office, such as better equipment, food and drinks, can make a big difference in workers’ morale. After all it is often the little things in life that tend to make people the happiest.”

Source: Accounting Principals; www.accountingprincipals.com.

Crew leaders entitled to overtime pay for ‘basic-necessities’ trips transporting farmworkers

May 26th, 2021

By Ronald Miller, J.D.
To be exempt from the overtime requirements, the driving trips must have been “performed … on a farm.”
“Basic-necessities” driving trips performed by crew leaders in transporting field workers between company housing and a grocery store, laundromat, and bank did not fall under the FLSA’s agricultural exemption from overtime [Read more...]

Reviving claim, Fourth Circuit sheds light on available evidentiary routes for proving same-sex harassment

May 25th, 2021

By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.
Joining most of its sister circuits, the Fourth Circuit concluded that the evidentiary routes set out in Oncale are not the only ones by which a plaintiff can prove same-sex sexual harassment.
In an appeal brought by a male employee in an all-male work environment who was physically assaulted by [Read more...]

Amazon facing five new lawsuits alleging race and sex discrimination, sexual harassment, retaliation

May 25th, 2021

By WK Editorial Staff
These latest suits follow an earlier one alleging a pattern of institutional racism in Amazon’s corporate offices.
Amazon.com is facing five new discrimination and retaliation lawsuits, all filed on May 19 by the same law firm, on behalf of women alleging that they were mistreated by primarily white male managers [Read more...]

Joint resolution to nix EEOC’s conciliation final rule clears Senate

May 25th, 2021

By Pamela Wolf, J.D.
Opponents of the rule contend that it disadvantages victims of discrimination, tipping the scales toward employers.
On May 19, the Senate gave a green light, albeit by a narrow margin of 50-48, to a joint resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act that would keep the EEOC’s Trump-era conciliation final [Read more...]

Firefighter could not prove union’s involvement in alleged discrimination and retaliation

May 21st, 2021

By Wayne D. Garris Jr., J.D.
He alleged that he was subjected to six years of retaliation after complaining about his supervisor’s use of a racial slur.
In the final of multiple opinions addressing a single notice of appeal filed by a Massachusetts firefighter, the First Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision to grant [Read more...]