About Us  |  About Cheetah®  |  Contact Us

Survey finds American workers spend an average of $3000 a year on coffee and lunch at work

American workers spend an alarmingly high amount of their hard earned cash on somewhat average daily expenses, according to a new Workonomix survey by Accounting Principals. The survey found that 50 percent of the American workforce spends approximately $1000 a year on coffee, or a weekly coffee habit of more than $20. And the spending doesn’t stop there. Two thirds (66 percent) of working Americans buy their lunch instead of packing it, costing them an average of $37 per week — nearly $2,000 a year.

Despite these high costs, the survey suggests workers are unclear about the biggest drain to their wallet. When asked which work expense they most want to be reimbursed for by their employer, 42 percent of employees chose commuting costs and only 11 percent chose lunch expenses. However, the average American’s commuting cost is $123 a month or approximately $1500 a year, which is well below the average annual lunch tab of $2000.

“Small — but consistent — expenses add up quickly over time, and it can be difficult for consumers to realize it because they’re only spending a few dollars at a time. But, as our survey shows, those few dollars can quickly turn into a few thousand dollars,” said Jodi Chavez, senior vice president, Accounting Principals. “Additionally, when you look at it over a worker’s lifetime, that number grows exponentially. Consider the average American who works for about 40 years, starting their first job around age 22. By the time they retire at age 62 they would have spent at minimum $120,000 on coffee and lunch, not including inflation.”

This is especially true for young American workers. The survey found that younger professionals (ages 18-34) spend almost twice as much on coffee during the week than those ages 45+ ($24.74 vs. $14.15, respectively). They also shell out more for lunch, spending an average of $44.78 per week on lunch compared to their older colleagues who spend $31.80 per week. However, it seems American workers of all ages are starting to realize the effect this incremental spending has on their personal bottom line. According to the survey, one-third (35 percent) of employees have made it a financial goal to bring lunch instead of buying it in 2012.

Other survey findings include:

  • Better food and coffee in the office might help cut back personal spending. Perhaps because of how much they’re spending outside the office, American workers would like companies to invest in better food and drinks in the office. One-quarter (25 percent) of Americans wish their company would invest in better vending machine snacks and 22 percent of American workers would like their company to invest in better coffee in the office.
  • Employers should focus on the “simple pleasures” to keep employees happy. Although better food and drinks would be a plus, employees most want to see their companies invest in better office equipment (46 percent) and more comfortable office chairs (32 percent) in 2012.
  • Corporate discounts do not factor into employees’ purchase decisions. Companies looking to attract new candidates shouldn’t focus on corporate discounts as a selling point. The majority (82 percent) of employees say corporate discounts matter little or not at all when buying a new product or service.

“As the recovery gains momentum and companies look to attract and retain talent, they should consider worrying less about big-ticket discounts and focus instead on what will impact their employees’ happiness every day,” said Chavez. “Small improvements around the office, such as better equipment, food and drinks, can make a big difference in workers’ morale. After all it is often the little things in life that tend to make people the happiest.”

Source: Accounting Principals; www.accountingprincipals.com.

No First Amendment protection for sheriff’s office employee who disclosed confidential info about potential misconduct in inmate’s death

May 28th, 2021

By Kathleen Kapusta, J.D.
The employee, who had no first-hand knowledge of the incident, “hastily divulged” the information, said the court, finding his interest in conveying the speech in question should be afforded diminished weight because it was not a “particularly informed opinion.”
Addressing for the second time a sheriff’s office employee’s [Read more...]

Court, not arbitrator, must decide whether contested arbitrator’s appointment under CBA was valid

May 28th, 2021

By Marjorie Johnson, J.D.
There was “no meeting of the minds” of the parties to empower the embattled arbitrator to decide himself whether he was validly appointed by the parties’ mutual agreement.
In a case stemming from a number of labor disputes between a maritime corporation and a union that represented a [Read more...]

Teachers can’t obtain TRO barring supplemental pay to those who worked 90 percent of days during COVID-19 pandemic

May 28th, 2021

By Victoria Moran, J.D., M.H.A.
The school board’s decision to exempt certain absences in determining eligibility for a $1,000 one-time payment to employees was in furtherance of government mandates to combat the coronavirus, reduce hospitalizations, and save lives.
A federal court in Louisiana denied a request by teachers for a temporary [Read more...]

Employers not required to record COVID vaccine adverse reactions through May 2022

May 28th, 2021

By Pamela Wolf, J.D.
And with the increase in vaccinations, do we still need an ETS to keep workers safe from the coronavirus?
OSHA, like most of us, has worked to stay abreast of the evolving pandemic information, providing COVID-19-related updates on issues within its purview. With the rise in the number of vaccinations [Read more...]

Female coach fired over misconduct with student-athletes fails to revive bias claims

May 26th, 2021

By Marjorie Johnson, J.D.
The coach’s allegations of different treatment from other coaches and athletes, and inequities between her teams and certain men’s teams, were insufficient as a matter of law to demonstrate that her termination was due to her sex.
A female head coach of a university’s women’s cross-country and track-and-field [Read more...]