About Us  |  About Cheetah®  |  Contact Us

Survey finds American workers spend an average of $3000 a year on coffee and lunch at work

American workers spend an alarmingly high amount of their hard earned cash on somewhat average daily expenses, according to a new Workonomix survey by Accounting Principals. The survey found that 50 percent of the American workforce spends approximately $1000 a year on coffee, or a weekly coffee habit of more than $20. And the spending doesn’t stop there. Two thirds (66 percent) of working Americans buy their lunch instead of packing it, costing them an average of $37 per week — nearly $2,000 a year.

Despite these high costs, the survey suggests workers are unclear about the biggest drain to their wallet. When asked which work expense they most want to be reimbursed for by their employer, 42 percent of employees chose commuting costs and only 11 percent chose lunch expenses. However, the average American’s commuting cost is $123 a month or approximately $1500 a year, which is well below the average annual lunch tab of $2000.

“Small — but consistent — expenses add up quickly over time, and it can be difficult for consumers to realize it because they’re only spending a few dollars at a time. But, as our survey shows, those few dollars can quickly turn into a few thousand dollars,” said Jodi Chavez, senior vice president, Accounting Principals. “Additionally, when you look at it over a worker’s lifetime, that number grows exponentially. Consider the average American who works for about 40 years, starting their first job around age 22. By the time they retire at age 62 they would have spent at minimum $120,000 on coffee and lunch, not including inflation.”

This is especially true for young American workers. The survey found that younger professionals (ages 18-34) spend almost twice as much on coffee during the week than those ages 45+ ($24.74 vs. $14.15, respectively). They also shell out more for lunch, spending an average of $44.78 per week on lunch compared to their older colleagues who spend $31.80 per week. However, it seems American workers of all ages are starting to realize the effect this incremental spending has on their personal bottom line. According to the survey, one-third (35 percent) of employees have made it a financial goal to bring lunch instead of buying it in 2012.

Other survey findings include:

  • Better food and coffee in the office might help cut back personal spending. Perhaps because of how much they’re spending outside the office, American workers would like companies to invest in better food and drinks in the office. One-quarter (25 percent) of Americans wish their company would invest in better vending machine snacks and 22 percent of American workers would like their company to invest in better coffee in the office.
  • Employers should focus on the “simple pleasures” to keep employees happy. Although better food and drinks would be a plus, employees most want to see their companies invest in better office equipment (46 percent) and more comfortable office chairs (32 percent) in 2012.
  • Corporate discounts do not factor into employees’ purchase decisions. Companies looking to attract new candidates shouldn’t focus on corporate discounts as a selling point. The majority (82 percent) of employees say corporate discounts matter little or not at all when buying a new product or service.

“As the recovery gains momentum and companies look to attract and retain talent, they should consider worrying less about big-ticket discounts and focus instead on what will impact their employees’ happiness every day,” said Chavez. “Small improvements around the office, such as better equipment, food and drinks, can make a big difference in workers’ morale. After all it is often the little things in life that tend to make people the happiest.”

Source: Accounting Principals; www.accountingprincipals.com.

Cyber charter school must answer for leave denial under FFCRA

May 13th, 2021

By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.
A teacher for the school was denied leave and required to teach twice as many students, even while her four children were also home-bound because of the pandemic.
A federal district court in Pennsylvania, ruling solely on the issue of whether the charter school was a covered [Read more...]

First Circuit revives retaliation claim of firefighter portrayed as ‘paranoid’ after complaining about supervisor’s racial slur

May 12th, 2021

By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.
“Just as large oaks from single acorns grow, so too—as this case illustrates—sprawling lawsuits can grow from a single, highly charged racial slur,” the First Circuit explained, vacating part of a summary judgment decision against the firefighter.
The First Circuit revived part of a lawsuit brought by [Read more...]

Affordable Care Act’s non-discrimination guarantees extend to LGBTQ people

May 12th, 2021

By Pamela Wolf, J.D.
The interpretation derives from the Supreme Court’s conclusion that the plain meaning of “because of sex” in Title VII necessarily included discrimination because of sexual orientation and gender identity.
In a Notice of Interpretation and Enforcement, the Department of Health and Human Services advised that effective May 10, 2021, its [Read more...]

Title VII, FMLA claims of Black dispatch supervisor, fired days after requesting FMLA leave, revived

May 11th, 2021

By Kathleen Kapusta, J.D.
Although the district court found she failed to present sufficient evidence of pretext, the appeals court noted that a white male supervisor who had also been caught sleeping on the job was not fired.
Reversing summary judgment on the Title VII and FMLA claims of a Black shift [Read more...]

White basketball coach’s reverse discrimination claims sidelined as not meeting ‘fuzzy’ Seventh Circuit standard for such claims

May 11th, 2021

By Robert Margolis, J.D.
Criticism of how the coach treated African-American players does not equate to discrimination based on his race or create a hostile work environment.
A white male basketball coach who resigned citing parental criticism of his handling of African-American players and interference by the school’s principal in his running [Read more...]