About Us  |  About Cheetah®  |  Contact Us

Survey finds American workers spend an average of $3000 a year on coffee and lunch at work

American workers spend an alarmingly high amount of their hard earned cash on somewhat average daily expenses, according to a new Workonomix survey by Accounting Principals. The survey found that 50 percent of the American workforce spends approximately $1000 a year on coffee, or a weekly coffee habit of more than $20. And the spending doesn’t stop there. Two thirds (66 percent) of working Americans buy their lunch instead of packing it, costing them an average of $37 per week — nearly $2,000 a year.

Despite these high costs, the survey suggests workers are unclear about the biggest drain to their wallet. When asked which work expense they most want to be reimbursed for by their employer, 42 percent of employees chose commuting costs and only 11 percent chose lunch expenses. However, the average American’s commuting cost is $123 a month or approximately $1500 a year, which is well below the average annual lunch tab of $2000.

“Small — but consistent — expenses add up quickly over time, and it can be difficult for consumers to realize it because they’re only spending a few dollars at a time. But, as our survey shows, those few dollars can quickly turn into a few thousand dollars,” said Jodi Chavez, senior vice president, Accounting Principals. “Additionally, when you look at it over a worker’s lifetime, that number grows exponentially. Consider the average American who works for about 40 years, starting their first job around age 22. By the time they retire at age 62 they would have spent at minimum $120,000 on coffee and lunch, not including inflation.”

This is especially true for young American workers. The survey found that younger professionals (ages 18-34) spend almost twice as much on coffee during the week than those ages 45+ ($24.74 vs. $14.15, respectively). They also shell out more for lunch, spending an average of $44.78 per week on lunch compared to their older colleagues who spend $31.80 per week. However, it seems American workers of all ages are starting to realize the effect this incremental spending has on their personal bottom line. According to the survey, one-third (35 percent) of employees have made it a financial goal to bring lunch instead of buying it in 2012.

Other survey findings include:

  • Better food and coffee in the office might help cut back personal spending. Perhaps because of how much they’re spending outside the office, American workers would like companies to invest in better food and drinks in the office. One-quarter (25 percent) of Americans wish their company would invest in better vending machine snacks and 22 percent of American workers would like their company to invest in better coffee in the office.
  • Employers should focus on the “simple pleasures” to keep employees happy. Although better food and drinks would be a plus, employees most want to see their companies invest in better office equipment (46 percent) and more comfortable office chairs (32 percent) in 2012.
  • Corporate discounts do not factor into employees’ purchase decisions. Companies looking to attract new candidates shouldn’t focus on corporate discounts as a selling point. The majority (82 percent) of employees say corporate discounts matter little or not at all when buying a new product or service.

“As the recovery gains momentum and companies look to attract and retain talent, they should consider worrying less about big-ticket discounts and focus instead on what will impact their employees’ happiness every day,” said Chavez. “Small improvements around the office, such as better equipment, food and drinks, can make a big difference in workers’ morale. After all it is often the little things in life that tend to make people the happiest.”

Source: Accounting Principals; www.accountingprincipals.com.

Manager rumored to have slept with boss to obtain promotions advances hostile environment claim

May 21st, 2021

By Kathleen Kapusta, J.D.
The rumor, said the court, demeaned the employee by suggesting she had obtained her position only through sex, an allegation that “goes right to the core of somebody’s merit as a human being.”
Addressing, on remand from the Fourth Circuit, the Title VII sexual harassment claim of a [Read more...]


Thai workers finally getting compensation after EEOC recovers $4.8M from Maui Pineapple

May 21st, 2021

By WK Editorial Staff
After a decade-long effort in the labor trafficking case, the EEOC recovered $4.8 million of the judgment due to the workers, thanks in part to cooperation from the Treasury Department and the Department of Justice.
In 2011 the EEOC filed a Title VII lawsuit against Maui Pineapple, Ltd. [Read more...]


Company owner cannot compel Secretary of Labor to arbitrate FLSA enforcement action seeking monetary relief for employees

May 20th, 2021

By Kathleen Kapusta, J.D.
Although the FAA establishes “a liberal federal party favoring arbitration agreements,” it does not require arbitration beyond the agreed-upon terms.
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in EEOC v. Waffle House, Inc., the Ninth Circuit found that the U.S. Secretary of Labor is not bound by a private arbitration [Read more...]


Female professor can’t proceed anonymously with bias claims against university

May 20th, 2021

By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.
She sought to pursue her claims anonymously because of the professional stigma and reputational damage she would face, as well as the publicizing of personal information involving her children, pregnancy, and miscarriage.
Affirming a decision denying a female professor’s motion to proceed anonymously in discrimination and [Read more...]


Four Seasons’ COVID furloughs violated WARN Act, employees allege

May 20th, 2021

By Wayne D. Garris Jr, J.D.
A class complaint accuses the luxury hotel operator of placing employees on indefinite furlough during the pandemic in order to avoid paying severance benefits.
On May 17, 2021, employees of the Four Seasons’ Miami, Florida location filed a putative class action complaint alleging that the hotel operator violated [Read more...]