About Us  |  About Cheetah®  |  Contact Us

Survey finds American workers spend an average of $3000 a year on coffee and lunch at work

American workers spend an alarmingly high amount of their hard earned cash on somewhat average daily expenses, according to a new Workonomix survey by Accounting Principals. The survey found that 50 percent of the American workforce spends approximately $1000 a year on coffee, or a weekly coffee habit of more than $20. And the spending doesn’t stop there. Two thirds (66 percent) of working Americans buy their lunch instead of packing it, costing them an average of $37 per week — nearly $2,000 a year.

Despite these high costs, the survey suggests workers are unclear about the biggest drain to their wallet. When asked which work expense they most want to be reimbursed for by their employer, 42 percent of employees chose commuting costs and only 11 percent chose lunch expenses. However, the average American’s commuting cost is $123 a month or approximately $1500 a year, which is well below the average annual lunch tab of $2000.

“Small — but consistent — expenses add up quickly over time, and it can be difficult for consumers to realize it because they’re only spending a few dollars at a time. But, as our survey shows, those few dollars can quickly turn into a few thousand dollars,” said Jodi Chavez, senior vice president, Accounting Principals. “Additionally, when you look at it over a worker’s lifetime, that number grows exponentially. Consider the average American who works for about 40 years, starting their first job around age 22. By the time they retire at age 62 they would have spent at minimum $120,000 on coffee and lunch, not including inflation.”

This is especially true for young American workers. The survey found that younger professionals (ages 18-34) spend almost twice as much on coffee during the week than those ages 45+ ($24.74 vs. $14.15, respectively). They also shell out more for lunch, spending an average of $44.78 per week on lunch compared to their older colleagues who spend $31.80 per week. However, it seems American workers of all ages are starting to realize the effect this incremental spending has on their personal bottom line. According to the survey, one-third (35 percent) of employees have made it a financial goal to bring lunch instead of buying it in 2012.

Other survey findings include:

  • Better food and coffee in the office might help cut back personal spending. Perhaps because of how much they’re spending outside the office, American workers would like companies to invest in better food and drinks in the office. One-quarter (25 percent) of Americans wish their company would invest in better vending machine snacks and 22 percent of American workers would like their company to invest in better coffee in the office.
  • Employers should focus on the “simple pleasures” to keep employees happy. Although better food and drinks would be a plus, employees most want to see their companies invest in better office equipment (46 percent) and more comfortable office chairs (32 percent) in 2012.
  • Corporate discounts do not factor into employees’ purchase decisions. Companies looking to attract new candidates shouldn’t focus on corporate discounts as a selling point. The majority (82 percent) of employees say corporate discounts matter little or not at all when buying a new product or service.

“As the recovery gains momentum and companies look to attract and retain talent, they should consider worrying less about big-ticket discounts and focus instead on what will impact their employees’ happiness every day,” said Chavez. “Small improvements around the office, such as better equipment, food and drinks, can make a big difference in workers’ morale. After all it is often the little things in life that tend to make people the happiest.”

Source: Accounting Principals; www.accountingprincipals.com.

Hispanic lieutenant’s meeting to discuss concerns about his career wasn’t protected speech

May 14th, 2021

By Marjorie Johnson, J.D.
Though the officer reported at the meeting that a police official speculated that another was racist, his stated motivation in speaking—to protect his own career—confirmed that he did not speak on a matter of public concern.
The Second Circuit affirmed dismissal of a Hispanic lieutenant’s First Amendment retaliation [Read more...]


Postal employee banned from wearing ‘MAGA’ hat advances race bias claim

May 14th, 2021

By Wayne D. Garris Jr., J.D.
The Caucasian employee alleged that an African-American coworker regularly violated the dress code but was never disciplined.
A federal district court in Kentucky declined to dismiss the race discrimination claims of a white USPS employee who alleged that the postal service enforced its dress code in a discriminatory [Read more...]


Employee fired after brother tests positive for COVID can’t advance associational discrimination claim

May 14th, 2021

By Kathleen Kapusta, J.D.
The court had little trouble disagreeing with the employee’s “legally flawed position” that anyone alleged to have COVID-19 is disabled under the ADA.
An employee who was fired after she “forgot” to tell her employer about a conversation she had with her brother/coworker shortly before he became ill with COVID-19 [Read more...]


NLRB must reassess seldom-seen order requiring reopening of closed business operations

May 13th, 2021

By Marjorie Johnson, J.D.
Though the Board found that a concrete company violated the NLRA by closing its auto repair operations after two mechanics turned in union authorization cards, the record showed the decision was due to the loss of the lease of the space.
Although substantial evidence supported the NLRB’s determination [Read more...]


Graphic design company can’t shake claim it fired employee for coronavirus-like illness

May 13th, 2021

By Wayne D. Garris Jr., J.D.
Before COVID-19 was declared an emergency in much of the U.S., the employee became seriously ill with a respiratory disease.
A federal district court in New York denied a graphic design company’s motion to dismiss the disability discrimination, wage, and breach of contract claims of a former employee [Read more...]