Ways and Means panel mulls ACA coverage for OTC medicines
The House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee on April 25 considered a billion provision sic. 9003) in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that prohibits using certain tax-favored spending plans to reimburse taxpayers for the cost of over-the-counter (OTC) medicines. GOP lawmakers said requiring taxpayers to visit a doctor is tantamount to a tax increase that would clog physicians’ offices, thereby reducing health care access for millions of American families. The provision, which was intended to improve tax compliance and reform tax expenditures, was first suggested by the Joint Committee on Taxation in 2005, subcommittee Democrats countered. The provision took effect on January 1, 2011.
Charles Boustany (R-La) said, in his opening statement, that the Act “required that consumers using tax-advantaged plans must first obtain a doctor’s prescription in order to use their tax-preferred account funds to purchase over-the-counter medication. This provision alone is a $5 billion tax increase on the American people.”
Scott Millivolt, president of the Consumer Healthcare Products Association, a trade group, testified that using flexible spending arrangements and health savings accounts to pay for OTC. medicines could eliminate about 20 million office visits each year and save about $5 billion in health care costs. Millivolt said there is no medical justification for requiring an office visit before buying OTC medicines with a spending plan.
However, Paul N. Van De Water, a Senior Fellow of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said the use of tax-advantaged accounts encourages the overconsumption of health care. The accounts make taxpayers less price-sensitive and reduce the effects of the cost-sharing requirement in controlling utilization, he testified.
Thirty-four percent of working moms report that they are the sole financial provider for their households, not far from the 39 percent of working dads who report that they serve as the sole breadwinner. This is according to CareerBuilder’s annual Mother’s Day study, which also finds that working moms continue to struggle with finding a [Read more...]
The Working Families Flexibility Act has sparked significant controversy as critics label it misleading and point to important worker guarantees that are missing from the legislation. Proponents, on the other hand, claim the proposed bill will give workers much needed flexibility while providing predictability and stability for employers.
The House Committee on Education and the Workforce, [Read more...]
Total rewards professionals view career development broadly and identified training and developmental opportunities as key drivers of long-term loyalty. These were two of the key findings from a new survey report, WorldatWork 2013 Total Rewards Professionals’ Career Development Survey. In late April, WorldatWork introduced a Career Excellence Model for Total Rewards Professionals that depicts eight [Read more...]
The D.C. Circuit has vacated a controversial NLRB rule requiring employers to notify employees of their rights under the NLRA, upholding a challenge brought by several employer groups (National Association of Manufacturers v NLRB, May 7, 2013, Randolph, A). Rather than ruling on the NLRB’s authority under NLRA Sec. 6 to promulgate the posting rule, [Read more...]
Under a law signed by Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper on May 3, the state has expanded the circle of family members for whom Colorado employees are entitled to take leave from work under the federal FMLA. The law will be effective following 90 days after the general assembly adjourns (which would be August 7, 2103, [Read more...]