About Us  |  About Cheetah®  |  Contact Us

Survey finds American workers spend an average of $3000 a year on coffee and lunch at work

American workers spend an alarmingly high amount of their hard earned cash on somewhat average daily expenses, according to a new Workonomix survey by Accounting Principals. The survey found that 50 percent of the American workforce spends approximately $1000 a year on coffee, or a weekly coffee habit of more than $20. And the spending doesn’t stop there. Two thirds (66 percent) of working Americans buy their lunch instead of packing it, costing them an average of $37 per week — nearly $2,000 a year.

Despite these high costs, the survey suggests workers are unclear about the biggest drain to their wallet. When asked which work expense they most want to be reimbursed for by their employer, 42 percent of employees chose commuting costs and only 11 percent chose lunch expenses. However, the average American’s commuting cost is $123 a month or approximately $1500 a year, which is well below the average annual lunch tab of $2000.

“Small — but consistent — expenses add up quickly over time, and it can be difficult for consumers to realize it because they’re only spending a few dollars at a time. But, as our survey shows, those few dollars can quickly turn into a few thousand dollars,” said Jodi Chavez, senior vice president, Accounting Principals. “Additionally, when you look at it over a worker’s lifetime, that number grows exponentially. Consider the average American who works for about 40 years, starting their first job around age 22. By the time they retire at age 62 they would have spent at minimum $120,000 on coffee and lunch, not including inflation.”

This is especially true for young American workers. The survey found that younger professionals (ages 18-34) spend almost twice as much on coffee during the week than those ages 45+ ($24.74 vs. $14.15, respectively). They also shell out more for lunch, spending an average of $44.78 per week on lunch compared to their older colleagues who spend $31.80 per week. However, it seems American workers of all ages are starting to realize the effect this incremental spending has on their personal bottom line. According to the survey, one-third (35 percent) of employees have made it a financial goal to bring lunch instead of buying it in 2012.

Other survey findings include:

  • Better food and coffee in the office might help cut back personal spending. Perhaps because of how much they’re spending outside the office, American workers would like companies to invest in better food and drinks in the office. One-quarter (25 percent) of Americans wish their company would invest in better vending machine snacks and 22 percent of American workers would like their company to invest in better coffee in the office.
  • Employers should focus on the “simple pleasures” to keep employees happy. Although better food and drinks would be a plus, employees most want to see their companies invest in better office equipment (46 percent) and more comfortable office chairs (32 percent) in 2012.
  • Corporate discounts do not factor into employees’ purchase decisions. Companies looking to attract new candidates shouldn’t focus on corporate discounts as a selling point. The majority (82 percent) of employees say corporate discounts matter little or not at all when buying a new product or service.

“As the recovery gains momentum and companies look to attract and retain talent, they should consider worrying less about big-ticket discounts and focus instead on what will impact their employees’ happiness every day,” said Chavez. “Small improvements around the office, such as better equipment, food and drinks, can make a big difference in workers’ morale. After all it is often the little things in life that tend to make people the happiest.”

Source: Accounting Principals; www.accountingprincipals.com.

‘Anti-American race and sex stereotyping and scapegoating’ EO implemented via complaint hotline

October 2nd, 2020

By WK Editorial Staff
Employees of federal contractors may now file complaints.
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs has established a hotline and email address to receive and investigate complaints under existing Executive Order 11246 and President Trump’s new “Executive Order Combating Race and Sex Stereotyping,” issued on September 22, 2020. The new OFCCP [Read more...]

New York City teachers cannot request remote work as accommodation based on family members’ COVID-19 risk

October 1st, 2020

By Tulay Turan, J.D.
The state’s accommodation policy was based on medical evidence, including guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the ADA, which does not require an accommodation for a relative’s disability.
The New York Department of Education’s COVID-19 accommodation policy had a rational basis and was [Read more...]

Dems update HEROES Act to reflect new needs, bipartisan negotiations

October 1st, 2020

By Pamela Wolf, J.D.
The updated version would improve the Paycheck Protection Program, extend the Payroll Support Program to keep airline industry workers paid, and provide $57 billion to support child care for families.
House Democrats have updated their Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions (HEROES) Act to address what they say [Read more...]

State high court would likely find implied private right of action in Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana Act

October 1st, 2020

By Kathleen Kapusta, J.D.
The court further found an employee who was discharged after failing a drug test because her medical marijuana card had expired plausibly alleged entitlement to relief under the MMA.
In an issue of first impression in the Circuit, a federal court in Pennsylvania held that the state’s high [Read more...]

Former FBI Deputy Director McCabe’s constitutional claims against FBI and DOJ proceed

October 1st, 2020

By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.
The long-time FBI employee who was fired on the night of his planned retirement alleged that his discharge stemmed from his unwillingness to pledge personal loyalty to President Trump and that the rush to judgment violated his due process rights.
A federal district court in the District [Read more...]