About Us  |  About Cheetah®  |  Contact Us

Survey finds American workers spend an average of $3000 a year on coffee and lunch at work

American workers spend an alarmingly high amount of their hard earned cash on somewhat average daily expenses, according to a new Workonomix survey by Accounting Principals. The survey found that 50 percent of the American workforce spends approximately $1000 a year on coffee, or a weekly coffee habit of more than $20. And the spending doesn’t stop there. Two thirds (66 percent) of working Americans buy their lunch instead of packing it, costing them an average of $37 per week — nearly $2,000 a year.

Despite these high costs, the survey suggests workers are unclear about the biggest drain to their wallet. When asked which work expense they most want to be reimbursed for by their employer, 42 percent of employees chose commuting costs and only 11 percent chose lunch expenses. However, the average American’s commuting cost is $123 a month or approximately $1500 a year, which is well below the average annual lunch tab of $2000.

“Small — but consistent — expenses add up quickly over time, and it can be difficult for consumers to realize it because they’re only spending a few dollars at a time. But, as our survey shows, those few dollars can quickly turn into a few thousand dollars,” said Jodi Chavez, senior vice president, Accounting Principals. “Additionally, when you look at it over a worker’s lifetime, that number grows exponentially. Consider the average American who works for about 40 years, starting their first job around age 22. By the time they retire at age 62 they would have spent at minimum $120,000 on coffee and lunch, not including inflation.”

This is especially true for young American workers. The survey found that younger professionals (ages 18-34) spend almost twice as much on coffee during the week than those ages 45+ ($24.74 vs. $14.15, respectively). They also shell out more for lunch, spending an average of $44.78 per week on lunch compared to their older colleagues who spend $31.80 per week. However, it seems American workers of all ages are starting to realize the effect this incremental spending has on their personal bottom line. According to the survey, one-third (35 percent) of employees have made it a financial goal to bring lunch instead of buying it in 2012.

Other survey findings include:

  • Better food and coffee in the office might help cut back personal spending. Perhaps because of how much they’re spending outside the office, American workers would like companies to invest in better food and drinks in the office. One-quarter (25 percent) of Americans wish their company would invest in better vending machine snacks and 22 percent of American workers would like their company to invest in better coffee in the office.
  • Employers should focus on the “simple pleasures” to keep employees happy. Although better food and drinks would be a plus, employees most want to see their companies invest in better office equipment (46 percent) and more comfortable office chairs (32 percent) in 2012.
  • Corporate discounts do not factor into employees’ purchase decisions. Companies looking to attract new candidates shouldn’t focus on corporate discounts as a selling point. The majority (82 percent) of employees say corporate discounts matter little or not at all when buying a new product or service.

“As the recovery gains momentum and companies look to attract and retain talent, they should consider worrying less about big-ticket discounts and focus instead on what will impact their employees’ happiness every day,” said Chavez. “Small improvements around the office, such as better equipment, food and drinks, can make a big difference in workers’ morale. After all it is often the little things in life that tend to make people the happiest.”

Source: Accounting Principals; www.accountingprincipals.com.

Lawsuit accuses FedEx of avoiding overtime obligations to drivers in New Mexico

October 16th, 2020

By Wayne D. Garris Jr., J.D.
The complaint accuses the delivery company of shifting from an independent contractor model to an “Independent Service Provider” model in order to continue to avoid its obligation under the state’s wage law.
On October 12, 2020, a New Mexico-based driver for FedEx filed a lawsuit accusing the delivery [Read more...]

Although supervisor used the ‘N-word,’ employer gets summary judgment on HWE claim; retaliation claim advances

October 16th, 2020

By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.
While the court agreed that use of the “N-word” is “severe,” it was not persuaded that the conduct rose to the level of an objectively hostile work environment.
A federal district court in Alabama granted an employer’s motion for summary judgment with respect to a hostile work [Read more...]

Fill-in supervisor couldn’t prove denial of promotion to permanent position was race discrimination

October 15th, 2020

By Wayne D. Garris Jr., J.D.
Both the district court and circuit court acknowledged that the eventual selectee may have been hired due to cronyism, but the employee couldn’t prove that his nonselection was discriminatory.
Affirming a district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, the [Read more...]

OSHA’s COVID-19 response update points to 25 more establishments cited, with additional $429K in penalties

October 15th, 2020

By Pamela Wolf, J.D.
The great bulk of citations were issued in September, with few issued before then.
In what seems an ongoing campaign to highlight its efforts following criticism for being “missing in action,” OSHA is once again touting its response to the COVID-19 crisis, noting that since the beginning of the pandemic through October [Read more...]

University facilities director’s email warning of potential COVID-19 exposure constitutionally protected conduct

October 14th, 2020

By Ronald Miller, J.D.
The employee sent an email to fellow workers them that “one of our colleagues is self-quarantined due to exposure to COVID-19,” and advising them to seek medical advice to determine their risk and course of action.
A university president was denied a motion to dismiss a suit brought [Read more...]