About Us  |  About Cheetah®  |  Contact Us

Survey finds American workers spend an average of $3000 a year on coffee and lunch at work

American workers spend an alarmingly high amount of their hard earned cash on somewhat average daily expenses, according to a new Workonomix survey by Accounting Principals. The survey found that 50 percent of the American workforce spends approximately $1000 a year on coffee, or a weekly coffee habit of more than $20. And the spending doesn’t stop there. Two thirds (66 percent) of working Americans buy their lunch instead of packing it, costing them an average of $37 per week — nearly $2,000 a year.

Despite these high costs, the survey suggests workers are unclear about the biggest drain to their wallet. When asked which work expense they most want to be reimbursed for by their employer, 42 percent of employees chose commuting costs and only 11 percent chose lunch expenses. However, the average American’s commuting cost is $123 a month or approximately $1500 a year, which is well below the average annual lunch tab of $2000.

“Small — but consistent — expenses add up quickly over time, and it can be difficult for consumers to realize it because they’re only spending a few dollars at a time. But, as our survey shows, those few dollars can quickly turn into a few thousand dollars,” said Jodi Chavez, senior vice president, Accounting Principals. “Additionally, when you look at it over a worker’s lifetime, that number grows exponentially. Consider the average American who works for about 40 years, starting their first job around age 22. By the time they retire at age 62 they would have spent at minimum $120,000 on coffee and lunch, not including inflation.”

This is especially true for young American workers. The survey found that younger professionals (ages 18-34) spend almost twice as much on coffee during the week than those ages 45+ ($24.74 vs. $14.15, respectively). They also shell out more for lunch, spending an average of $44.78 per week on lunch compared to their older colleagues who spend $31.80 per week. However, it seems American workers of all ages are starting to realize the effect this incremental spending has on their personal bottom line. According to the survey, one-third (35 percent) of employees have made it a financial goal to bring lunch instead of buying it in 2012.

Other survey findings include:

  • Better food and coffee in the office might help cut back personal spending. Perhaps because of how much they’re spending outside the office, American workers would like companies to invest in better food and drinks in the office. One-quarter (25 percent) of Americans wish their company would invest in better vending machine snacks and 22 percent of American workers would like their company to invest in better coffee in the office.
  • Employers should focus on the “simple pleasures” to keep employees happy. Although better food and drinks would be a plus, employees most want to see their companies invest in better office equipment (46 percent) and more comfortable office chairs (32 percent) in 2012.
  • Corporate discounts do not factor into employees’ purchase decisions. Companies looking to attract new candidates shouldn’t focus on corporate discounts as a selling point. The majority (82 percent) of employees say corporate discounts matter little or not at all when buying a new product or service.

“As the recovery gains momentum and companies look to attract and retain talent, they should consider worrying less about big-ticket discounts and focus instead on what will impact their employees’ happiness every day,” said Chavez. “Small improvements around the office, such as better equipment, food and drinks, can make a big difference in workers’ morale. After all it is often the little things in life that tend to make people the happiest.”

Source: Accounting Principals; www.accountingprincipals.com.

Male comparators didn’t engage in similar security-related misconduct, dooming sex bias claim

September 19th, 2018

By Lorene D. Park, J.D.
Affirming summary judgment against a Title VII gender discrimination claim by a female security employee at a Puerto Rico airport, the First Circuit found that three security violations, including abandoning her post, piggybacking through a security door, and using her cellphone while on duty were legitimate reasons for her discharge and [Read more...]

A deeper look at the NLRB’s joint-employer proposal

September 18th, 2018

By Pamela Wolf, J.D.
On September 14, the National Labor Relations Board published its greatly anticipated proposed rule joint-employer rule. The proposed rule mirrors the standard that the Board tried to put into place in its now-vacated December 2017 Hy-Brand Industrial Contractors, Ltd. decision, which would have overturned the more expansive Obama-era standard installed under the [Read more...]

LMRA preempts Wisconsin law shortening irrevocability of dues-checkoff authorizations from one year to 30 days

September 18th, 2018

By Ronald Miller, J.D.
Wisconsin’s attempt to shorten the maximum period for which a dues-checkoff authorization is irrevocable from no longer than one year to 30 days was preempted by federal labor law, ruled a divided Seventh Circuit, in a 2-1 decision. Because the challenged portion of Wisconsin’s Act 1 regulates an employee’s optional dues-checkoff authorization [Read more...]

Nuclear power plant worker’s state-law disability bias claim preempted by LMRA, required CBA interpretation

September 18th, 2018

By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.
A worker whose lawsuit for disability discrimination was dealt a one-two punch by a federal district court—which had determined that the state-law claim was preempted by the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) and then had granted judgment on the pleadings to his employer based on its untimely filing—was unable to revive [Read more...]

NLRB proposes new joint-employer standard tracking vacated Hy-Brand decision

September 17th, 2018

By Pamela Wolf, J.D.
The National Labor Relations Board has taken the widely anticipated step that has been on the radar of labor and employment lawyers for several months—it has released its proposed rule on the standard for determining joint-employer status. Under the proposal, an employer may be considered a joint employer of a separate employer’s [Read more...]