About Us  |  About Cheetah®  |  Contact Us

Survey finds American workers spend an average of $3000 a year on coffee and lunch at work

American workers spend an alarmingly high amount of their hard earned cash on somewhat average daily expenses, according to a new Workonomix survey by Accounting Principals. The survey found that 50 percent of the American workforce spends approximately $1000 a year on coffee, or a weekly coffee habit of more than $20. And the spending doesn’t stop there. Two thirds (66 percent) of working Americans buy their lunch instead of packing it, costing them an average of $37 per week — nearly $2,000 a year.

Despite these high costs, the survey suggests workers are unclear about the biggest drain to their wallet. When asked which work expense they most want to be reimbursed for by their employer, 42 percent of employees chose commuting costs and only 11 percent chose lunch expenses. However, the average American’s commuting cost is $123 a month or approximately $1500 a year, which is well below the average annual lunch tab of $2000.

“Small — but consistent — expenses add up quickly over time, and it can be difficult for consumers to realize it because they’re only spending a few dollars at a time. But, as our survey shows, those few dollars can quickly turn into a few thousand dollars,” said Jodi Chavez, senior vice president, Accounting Principals. “Additionally, when you look at it over a worker’s lifetime, that number grows exponentially. Consider the average American who works for about 40 years, starting their first job around age 22. By the time they retire at age 62 they would have spent at minimum $120,000 on coffee and lunch, not including inflation.”

This is especially true for young American workers. The survey found that younger professionals (ages 18-34) spend almost twice as much on coffee during the week than those ages 45+ ($24.74 vs. $14.15, respectively). They also shell out more for lunch, spending an average of $44.78 per week on lunch compared to their older colleagues who spend $31.80 per week. However, it seems American workers of all ages are starting to realize the effect this incremental spending has on their personal bottom line. According to the survey, one-third (35 percent) of employees have made it a financial goal to bring lunch instead of buying it in 2012.

Other survey findings include:

  • Better food and coffee in the office might help cut back personal spending. Perhaps because of how much they’re spending outside the office, American workers would like companies to invest in better food and drinks in the office. One-quarter (25 percent) of Americans wish their company would invest in better vending machine snacks and 22 percent of American workers would like their company to invest in better coffee in the office.
  • Employers should focus on the “simple pleasures” to keep employees happy. Although better food and drinks would be a plus, employees most want to see their companies invest in better office equipment (46 percent) and more comfortable office chairs (32 percent) in 2012.
  • Corporate discounts do not factor into employees’ purchase decisions. Companies looking to attract new candidates shouldn’t focus on corporate discounts as a selling point. The majority (82 percent) of employees say corporate discounts matter little or not at all when buying a new product or service.

“As the recovery gains momentum and companies look to attract and retain talent, they should consider worrying less about big-ticket discounts and focus instead on what will impact their employees’ happiness every day,” said Chavez. “Small improvements around the office, such as better equipment, food and drinks, can make a big difference in workers’ morale. After all it is often the little things in life that tend to make people the happiest.”

Source: Accounting Principals; www.accountingprincipals.com.

Sales rep who planned to compete with employer can’t revive FMLA claims, but counterclaims against her are reversed

April 26th, 2018

By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D.
A sales rep who took FMLA leave to attend a training for a competing franchise she had set up with her husband was unable to revive her claim her employer interfered with her FMLA rights by offering to let her service existing clients during her FMLA leave so that she could continue [Read more...]

HR staffer fired day after returning from maternity leave can’t prove bias claims

April 26th, 2018

By Kathleen Kapusta, J.D.
Finding no error in the award of summary judgment against the various discrimination and retaliation claims of a senior HR employee fired the day she returned from maternity leave, the Sixth Circuit in an unpublished opinion noted that although the timing of her termination was unfortunate and the manner in which it [Read more...]

Amount in controversy includes all relief claimed at time of removal to which plaintiff would be entitled if victorious

April 25th, 2018

By Kathleen Kapusta, J.D.
The amount-in-controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction is what is at stake in the litigation at the time of removal, the Ninth Circuit asserted, and where, as here, a plaintiff’s complaint at the time of removal alleges wrongful discharge resulting in lost future wages, those future wages are included in the amount in [Read more...]

Caregiver may sue for retaliation based on advocacy for disabled adults in her care

April 25th, 2018

By Robert Margolis, J.D.
A foster care provider has standing to bring retaliation claims under the Rehab Act against an agency that allegedly took action against her in response to her advocacy on behalf of the persons in her care, a federal district judge in Massachusetts has held. The court denied in part and granted in [Read more...]

Firing disabled employee but not coworker for same policy violation suggested pretext

April 25th, 2018

By Lorene D. Park, J.D.
Evidence that a funeral home employee was fired after a deceased body was left overnight without refrigeration, while a coworker who had signed for custody of the body wasn’t even questioned, suggested the reason for firing the employee was pretextual, concluded a federal district court in Tennessee, denying the employer’s motion [Read more...]