About Us  |  About Cheetah®  |  Contact Us

Survey finds American workers spend an average of $3000 a year on coffee and lunch at work

American workers spend an alarmingly high amount of their hard earned cash on somewhat average daily expenses, according to a new Workonomix survey by Accounting Principals. The survey found that 50 percent of the American workforce spends approximately $1000 a year on coffee, or a weekly coffee habit of more than $20. And the spending doesn’t stop there. Two thirds (66 percent) of working Americans buy their lunch instead of packing it, costing them an average of $37 per week — nearly $2,000 a year.

Despite these high costs, the survey suggests workers are unclear about the biggest drain to their wallet. When asked which work expense they most want to be reimbursed for by their employer, 42 percent of employees chose commuting costs and only 11 percent chose lunch expenses. However, the average American’s commuting cost is $123 a month or approximately $1500 a year, which is well below the average annual lunch tab of $2000.

“Small — but consistent — expenses add up quickly over time, and it can be difficult for consumers to realize it because they’re only spending a few dollars at a time. But, as our survey shows, those few dollars can quickly turn into a few thousand dollars,” said Jodi Chavez, senior vice president, Accounting Principals. “Additionally, when you look at it over a worker’s lifetime, that number grows exponentially. Consider the average American who works for about 40 years, starting their first job around age 22. By the time they retire at age 62 they would have spent at minimum $120,000 on coffee and lunch, not including inflation.”

This is especially true for young American workers. The survey found that younger professionals (ages 18-34) spend almost twice as much on coffee during the week than those ages 45+ ($24.74 vs. $14.15, respectively). They also shell out more for lunch, spending an average of $44.78 per week on lunch compared to their older colleagues who spend $31.80 per week. However, it seems American workers of all ages are starting to realize the effect this incremental spending has on their personal bottom line. According to the survey, one-third (35 percent) of employees have made it a financial goal to bring lunch instead of buying it in 2012.

Other survey findings include:

  • Better food and coffee in the office might help cut back personal spending. Perhaps because of how much they’re spending outside the office, American workers would like companies to invest in better food and drinks in the office. One-quarter (25 percent) of Americans wish their company would invest in better vending machine snacks and 22 percent of American workers would like their company to invest in better coffee in the office.
  • Employers should focus on the “simple pleasures” to keep employees happy. Although better food and drinks would be a plus, employees most want to see their companies invest in better office equipment (46 percent) and more comfortable office chairs (32 percent) in 2012.
  • Corporate discounts do not factor into employees’ purchase decisions. Companies looking to attract new candidates shouldn’t focus on corporate discounts as a selling point. The majority (82 percent) of employees say corporate discounts matter little or not at all when buying a new product or service.

“As the recovery gains momentum and companies look to attract and retain talent, they should consider worrying less about big-ticket discounts and focus instead on what will impact their employees’ happiness every day,” said Chavez. “Small improvements around the office, such as better equipment, food and drinks, can make a big difference in workers’ morale. After all it is often the little things in life that tend to make people the happiest.”

Source: Accounting Principals; www.accountingprincipals.com.

Justices contemplate application of California wage-hour law to an offshore drilling platform

April 18th, 2019

By Pamela Wolf, J.D.
The Ninth Circuit applied California law as a surrogate under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, contrary to the Fifth Circuit’s requirement there must be a gap in coverage of federal law, to do so.
On April 16, the Supreme Court heard argument on the sticky question of whether, under the Outer Continental [Read more...]


Nine newly released NLRB advice memos span 8 years, address work rules, dues revocation, among other topics

April 18th, 2019

By Pamela Wolf, J.D.
The memos, dated between 2011 and 2019, address topics such as union discipline and checkoff revocation, and employer social media and media communication rules, among others.
On April 15, the National Labor Relations Board released a bundle of nine Advice Memoranda, issued between 2011 to 2019, covering a broad range of topics such [Read more...]


Class action revived in suit alleging P.F. Chang’s owed workers for reporting pay

April 17th, 2019

By Ronald Miller, J.D.
The Massachusetts high court concluded that Mass. R. Civ. P. 23 provides the correct standard for determining class certification under the state wage laws, and the wage laws did not infer a more lenient standard. Even so, a restaurant employee met his burden of demonstrating numerosity under that rule.
A combination of thousands [Read more...]


Comparator evidence supported $259K jury verdict following trial on 57-year-old GNC store manager’s bias claim

April 17th, 2019

By Marjorie Johnson, J.D.
The Third Circuit found that five younger managers were similarly situated despite the employer’s assertion that none had overseen stores that had failing audit scores, and some had only been working a short time or had engaged in different misconduct.
Refusing to disturb a $258,926 jury verdict awarded to a 57-year-old store manager [Read more...]


Questioning but following Third Circuit precedent, court dismisses Title VII sexual orientation claim

April 17th, 2019

By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.
While the court noted that the appeals court’s 18-year-old Bibby decision had questionable continued applicability in its distinctions between gender stereotyping and sexual orientation claims, it dismissed the case without prejudice.
A Title VII lawsuit filed by a casino dealer who alleged she was subjected to a hostile work environment and eventually [Read more...]