About Us  |  About Cheetah®  |  Contact Us

Survey finds American workers spend an average of $3000 a year on coffee and lunch at work

American workers spend an alarmingly high amount of their hard earned cash on somewhat average daily expenses, according to a new Workonomix survey by Accounting Principals. The survey found that 50 percent of the American workforce spends approximately $1000 a year on coffee, or a weekly coffee habit of more than $20. And the spending doesn’t stop there. Two thirds (66 percent) of working Americans buy their lunch instead of packing it, costing them an average of $37 per week — nearly $2,000 a year.

Despite these high costs, the survey suggests workers are unclear about the biggest drain to their wallet. When asked which work expense they most want to be reimbursed for by their employer, 42 percent of employees chose commuting costs and only 11 percent chose lunch expenses. However, the average American’s commuting cost is $123 a month or approximately $1500 a year, which is well below the average annual lunch tab of $2000.

“Small — but consistent — expenses add up quickly over time, and it can be difficult for consumers to realize it because they’re only spending a few dollars at a time. But, as our survey shows, those few dollars can quickly turn into a few thousand dollars,” said Jodi Chavez, senior vice president, Accounting Principals. “Additionally, when you look at it over a worker’s lifetime, that number grows exponentially. Consider the average American who works for about 40 years, starting their first job around age 22. By the time they retire at age 62 they would have spent at minimum $120,000 on coffee and lunch, not including inflation.”

This is especially true for young American workers. The survey found that younger professionals (ages 18-34) spend almost twice as much on coffee during the week than those ages 45+ ($24.74 vs. $14.15, respectively). They also shell out more for lunch, spending an average of $44.78 per week on lunch compared to their older colleagues who spend $31.80 per week. However, it seems American workers of all ages are starting to realize the effect this incremental spending has on their personal bottom line. According to the survey, one-third (35 percent) of employees have made it a financial goal to bring lunch instead of buying it in 2012.

Other survey findings include:

  • Better food and coffee in the office might help cut back personal spending. Perhaps because of how much they’re spending outside the office, American workers would like companies to invest in better food and drinks in the office. One-quarter (25 percent) of Americans wish their company would invest in better vending machine snacks and 22 percent of American workers would like their company to invest in better coffee in the office.
  • Employers should focus on the “simple pleasures” to keep employees happy. Although better food and drinks would be a plus, employees most want to see their companies invest in better office equipment (46 percent) and more comfortable office chairs (32 percent) in 2012.
  • Corporate discounts do not factor into employees’ purchase decisions. Companies looking to attract new candidates shouldn’t focus on corporate discounts as a selling point. The majority (82 percent) of employees say corporate discounts matter little or not at all when buying a new product or service.

“As the recovery gains momentum and companies look to attract and retain talent, they should consider worrying less about big-ticket discounts and focus instead on what will impact their employees’ happiness every day,” said Chavez. “Small improvements around the office, such as better equipment, food and drinks, can make a big difference in workers’ morale. After all it is often the little things in life that tend to make people the happiest.”

Source: Accounting Principals; www.accountingprincipals.com.

Bonuses paid by third party not included in regular rate without employer-employee agreement

August 22nd, 2019

By Wayne D. Garris Jr., J.D.
The DOL’s assertion that all third-party bonuses must be included in regular rate of pay for calculating overtime was not supported by the FLSA, case law, or agency practice.
Employers are not required to include bonuses from third parties in the regular rate of pay when calculating overtime pay, the Third [Read more...]

Morbidly obese employee fired for falsifying work records, not weight

August 22nd, 2019

By Kathleen Kapusta, J.D.
The employee, who weighed over 300 pounds during the 10 years he worked for the company, admitted to falsifying work records to show he had completed work assignments he had not actually completed.
Skirting the issue of whether morbid obesity is itself an impairment under the ADA, the Ninth Circuit explained that even [Read more...]

ICE detained wage-hour plaintiff during break from court-ordered deposition, petition alleges

August 22nd, 2019

By Pamela Wolf, J.D.
The habeas petition also contends that the arrest and detention of the former employee who sued his restaurant employer and its owner/operator—allegedly a former government agent—for unpaid wages, was prompted by the defendants’ retaliatory tip.
A 45-year-old former resident of China who has lived in New York for more than 18 years was [Read more...]

AutoZone employee fired for her crude remark to coworker who made disparaging comments about women can’t revive bias claim

August 21st, 2019

By Kathleen Kapusta, J.D.
The employee failed to show that AutoZone had any knowledge of the coworker’s alleged sexist comments until an investigation that resulted in the termination of both employees.
Affirming summary judgment against the state-law discriminatory termination claim of a female AutoZone employee who was fired for a single crude remark to a male coworker, [Read more...]

Judges’ cautionary letter supports court employee’s hostile environment claim

August 21st, 2019

By Joy P. Waltemath, J.D.
Although most of the employee’s claims failed for lack of specificity, her allegations about one judge’s racist and sexist allusions were enough to avoid dismissal.
Resurrecting only the hostile work environment claim of a dockets coordinator against one municipal court judge—she had sued four—the Sixth Circuit mostly agreed with the lower court [Read more...]