About Us  |  About Cheetah®  |  Contact Us

Survey finds American workers spend an average of $3000 a year on coffee and lunch at work

American workers spend an alarmingly high amount of their hard earned cash on somewhat average daily expenses, according to a new Workonomix survey by Accounting Principals. The survey found that 50 percent of the American workforce spends approximately $1000 a year on coffee, or a weekly coffee habit of more than $20. And the spending doesn’t stop there. Two thirds (66 percent) of working Americans buy their lunch instead of packing it, costing them an average of $37 per week — nearly $2,000 a year.

Despite these high costs, the survey suggests workers are unclear about the biggest drain to their wallet. When asked which work expense they most want to be reimbursed for by their employer, 42 percent of employees chose commuting costs and only 11 percent chose lunch expenses. However, the average American’s commuting cost is $123 a month or approximately $1500 a year, which is well below the average annual lunch tab of $2000.

“Small — but consistent — expenses add up quickly over time, and it can be difficult for consumers to realize it because they’re only spending a few dollars at a time. But, as our survey shows, those few dollars can quickly turn into a few thousand dollars,” said Jodi Chavez, senior vice president, Accounting Principals. “Additionally, when you look at it over a worker’s lifetime, that number grows exponentially. Consider the average American who works for about 40 years, starting their first job around age 22. By the time they retire at age 62 they would have spent at minimum $120,000 on coffee and lunch, not including inflation.”

This is especially true for young American workers. The survey found that younger professionals (ages 18-34) spend almost twice as much on coffee during the week than those ages 45+ ($24.74 vs. $14.15, respectively). They also shell out more for lunch, spending an average of $44.78 per week on lunch compared to their older colleagues who spend $31.80 per week. However, it seems American workers of all ages are starting to realize the effect this incremental spending has on their personal bottom line. According to the survey, one-third (35 percent) of employees have made it a financial goal to bring lunch instead of buying it in 2012.

Other survey findings include:

  • Better food and coffee in the office might help cut back personal spending. Perhaps because of how much they’re spending outside the office, American workers would like companies to invest in better food and drinks in the office. One-quarter (25 percent) of Americans wish their company would invest in better vending machine snacks and 22 percent of American workers would like their company to invest in better coffee in the office.
  • Employers should focus on the “simple pleasures” to keep employees happy. Although better food and drinks would be a plus, employees most want to see their companies invest in better office equipment (46 percent) and more comfortable office chairs (32 percent) in 2012.
  • Corporate discounts do not factor into employees’ purchase decisions. Companies looking to attract new candidates shouldn’t focus on corporate discounts as a selling point. The majority (82 percent) of employees say corporate discounts matter little or not at all when buying a new product or service.

“As the recovery gains momentum and companies look to attract and retain talent, they should consider worrying less about big-ticket discounts and focus instead on what will impact their employees’ happiness every day,” said Chavez. “Small improvements around the office, such as better equipment, food and drinks, can make a big difference in workers’ morale. After all it is often the little things in life that tend to make people the happiest.”

Source: Accounting Principals; www.accountingprincipals.com.

NLRB final rule revises, codifies several representation policies, procedures

April 2nd, 2020

By Lisa Milam, J.D. and Joy P. Waltemath, J.D.
The final rule revises the NLRB’s blocking charge policy, voluntary recognition bar, and Section 9(a) construction industry provisions, making some substantive changes to the rule as initially proposed.
The NLRB announced on Tuesday, March 31, that it has finalized several amendments to its [Read more...]


Updated DOL guidance clarifies who is a ‘health care provider,’ other aspects of FFCRA

April 2nd, 2020

By Pamela Wolf, J.D.
The guidance also clarifies the scope of the small business exemption, among other things.
The DOL’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) continues to publish a steady stream of guidance aimed at providing updated information to employees and employers about the protections and relief available under the Families First Coronavirus Response [Read more...]


Amazon, Instacart, Whole Foods workers protest lack of COVID-19 safety

April 2nd, 2020

By Pamela Wolf, J.D.
Amazon, Instacart, and Whole Foods workers have protested an alleged lack of COVID-19 safety precautions, sick leave, and hazard pay.
Following media reports of a “walkout” at Amazon and Instacart to protest unsafe working conditions amidst the COVID-19 crisis, and Amazon’s firing of an employee who organized that [Read more...]


AFGE sues federal government for COVID-19 hazard pay

April 2nd, 2020

By Wayne D. Garris Jr., J.D.
The public sector union teamed with a Washington, D.C., law firm to bring the class lawsuit on behalf of all federal employees who may have been exposed to COVID-19.
On March 30, the American Federation of Government Employees and the law firm Kalijarvi, Chuzi, Newman & [Read more...]


Computer Fraud and Abuse Act does not criminalize researchers’ plans to test employment websites for discriminatory algorithm

April 2nd, 2020

By Robert Margolis, J.D.
Researchers plan to create fictitious job candidate profiles and fictitious job opportunities, in violation of the websites’ terms of service, to test if the websites discriminate.
Researchers testing whether the algorithms of online job websites discriminate against job candidates on such bases as race, gender, and age will [Read more...]