About Us  |  About Cheetah®  |  Contact Us

Survey finds American workers spend an average of $3000 a year on coffee and lunch at work

American workers spend an alarmingly high amount of their hard earned cash on somewhat average daily expenses, according to a new Workonomix survey by Accounting Principals. The survey found that 50 percent of the American workforce spends approximately $1000 a year on coffee, or a weekly coffee habit of more than $20. And the spending doesn’t stop there. Two thirds (66 percent) of working Americans buy their lunch instead of packing it, costing them an average of $37 per week — nearly $2,000 a year.

Despite these high costs, the survey suggests workers are unclear about the biggest drain to their wallet. When asked which work expense they most want to be reimbursed for by their employer, 42 percent of employees chose commuting costs and only 11 percent chose lunch expenses. However, the average American’s commuting cost is $123 a month or approximately $1500 a year, which is well below the average annual lunch tab of $2000.

“Small — but consistent — expenses add up quickly over time, and it can be difficult for consumers to realize it because they’re only spending a few dollars at a time. But, as our survey shows, those few dollars can quickly turn into a few thousand dollars,” said Jodi Chavez, senior vice president, Accounting Principals. “Additionally, when you look at it over a worker’s lifetime, that number grows exponentially. Consider the average American who works for about 40 years, starting their first job around age 22. By the time they retire at age 62 they would have spent at minimum $120,000 on coffee and lunch, not including inflation.”

This is especially true for young American workers. The survey found that younger professionals (ages 18-34) spend almost twice as much on coffee during the week than those ages 45+ ($24.74 vs. $14.15, respectively). They also shell out more for lunch, spending an average of $44.78 per week on lunch compared to their older colleagues who spend $31.80 per week. However, it seems American workers of all ages are starting to realize the effect this incremental spending has on their personal bottom line. According to the survey, one-third (35 percent) of employees have made it a financial goal to bring lunch instead of buying it in 2012.

Other survey findings include:

  • Better food and coffee in the office might help cut back personal spending. Perhaps because of how much they’re spending outside the office, American workers would like companies to invest in better food and drinks in the office. One-quarter (25 percent) of Americans wish their company would invest in better vending machine snacks and 22 percent of American workers would like their company to invest in better coffee in the office.
  • Employers should focus on the “simple pleasures” to keep employees happy. Although better food and drinks would be a plus, employees most want to see their companies invest in better office equipment (46 percent) and more comfortable office chairs (32 percent) in 2012.
  • Corporate discounts do not factor into employees’ purchase decisions. Companies looking to attract new candidates shouldn’t focus on corporate discounts as a selling point. The majority (82 percent) of employees say corporate discounts matter little or not at all when buying a new product or service.

“As the recovery gains momentum and companies look to attract and retain talent, they should consider worrying less about big-ticket discounts and focus instead on what will impact their employees’ happiness every day,” said Chavez. “Small improvements around the office, such as better equipment, food and drinks, can make a big difference in workers’ morale. After all it is often the little things in life that tend to make people the happiest.”

Source: Accounting Principals; www.accountingprincipals.com.

Pilots’ USERRA class claims alleging airlines’ reemployment policies are unlawful survive

June 24th, 2019

By Lisa Milam, J.D.
The court refused to dismiss a USERRA class action alleging the airlines’ reemployment policies hurt pilots who take short-term military leave.
A pilot and National Guardsman seeking to pursue class USERRA claims against Alaska Airlines and Horizon Airlines survived the airlines’ motions to dismiss his suit alleging he should have been paid during [Read more...]

Unions’ data breach lawsuits against OPM revived in part by D.C. Circuit

June 24th, 2019

By Joy P. Waltemath, J.D.
One of two consolidated complaints—one brought by AFGE and a putative class and another by NTEU—resulting from a massive security breach of OPM affecting more than 21 million people has been revived by the D.C. Circuit.
In 2014, cyberattackers breached multiple U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) databases and allegedly stole the [Read more...]

Employee offered sufficient cat’s paw evidence that military service was motivating factor in discharge

June 21st, 2019

By Ronald Miller, J.D.
A stratified termination procedure created circumstances in which a biased direct supervisor could make a “cat’s paw” of upper management, leaving it for a jury to decide whether a senior manager was the proximate cause of a service member’s termination.
Finding that an employee gathered evidence during discovery that would allow a reasonable [Read more...]

Do courts have authority under FLSA to review settled attorneys’ fees?

June 21st, 2019

By Lisa Milam, J.D.
No, the Eighth Circuit held. A court’s authority to review wage settlements under FLSA Section 216(b) does not extend to reviewing the parties’ settled attorney fees. The district court erred in reducing the fee award.
Picking up where it left off in its 2018 decision in Melgar v. OK Foods, which addressed the [Read more...]

Employee need not arbitrate representative PAGA claim despite SCOTUS approval of class action waivers

June 21st, 2019

By Marjorie Johnson, J.D.
Considerations that led the Supreme Court to rule that class action waivers in arbitration agreements are enforceable are not implicated to the same extent by arbitration of PAGA claims, which don’t require the formal procedures of class arbitration.
A former employee wasn’t required to arbitrate his representative claim brought under California’s Private Attorneys [Read more...]