About Us  |  About Cheetah®  |  Contact Us

Survey finds American workers spend an average of $3000 a year on coffee and lunch at work

American workers spend an alarmingly high amount of their hard earned cash on somewhat average daily expenses, according to a new Workonomix survey by Accounting Principals. The survey found that 50 percent of the American workforce spends approximately $1000 a year on coffee, or a weekly coffee habit of more than $20. And the spending doesn’t stop there. Two thirds (66 percent) of working Americans buy their lunch instead of packing it, costing them an average of $37 per week — nearly $2,000 a year.

Despite these high costs, the survey suggests workers are unclear about the biggest drain to their wallet. When asked which work expense they most want to be reimbursed for by their employer, 42 percent of employees chose commuting costs and only 11 percent chose lunch expenses. However, the average American’s commuting cost is $123 a month or approximately $1500 a year, which is well below the average annual lunch tab of $2000.

“Small — but consistent — expenses add up quickly over time, and it can be difficult for consumers to realize it because they’re only spending a few dollars at a time. But, as our survey shows, those few dollars can quickly turn into a few thousand dollars,” said Jodi Chavez, senior vice president, Accounting Principals. “Additionally, when you look at it over a worker’s lifetime, that number grows exponentially. Consider the average American who works for about 40 years, starting their first job around age 22. By the time they retire at age 62 they would have spent at minimum $120,000 on coffee and lunch, not including inflation.”

This is especially true for young American workers. The survey found that younger professionals (ages 18-34) spend almost twice as much on coffee during the week than those ages 45+ ($24.74 vs. $14.15, respectively). They also shell out more for lunch, spending an average of $44.78 per week on lunch compared to their older colleagues who spend $31.80 per week. However, it seems American workers of all ages are starting to realize the effect this incremental spending has on their personal bottom line. According to the survey, one-third (35 percent) of employees have made it a financial goal to bring lunch instead of buying it in 2012.

Other survey findings include:

  • Better food and coffee in the office might help cut back personal spending. Perhaps because of how much they’re spending outside the office, American workers would like companies to invest in better food and drinks in the office. One-quarter (25 percent) of Americans wish their company would invest in better vending machine snacks and 22 percent of American workers would like their company to invest in better coffee in the office.
  • Employers should focus on the “simple pleasures” to keep employees happy. Although better food and drinks would be a plus, employees most want to see their companies invest in better office equipment (46 percent) and more comfortable office chairs (32 percent) in 2012.
  • Corporate discounts do not factor into employees’ purchase decisions. Companies looking to attract new candidates shouldn’t focus on corporate discounts as a selling point. The majority (82 percent) of employees say corporate discounts matter little or not at all when buying a new product or service.

“As the recovery gains momentum and companies look to attract and retain talent, they should consider worrying less about big-ticket discounts and focus instead on what will impact their employees’ happiness every day,” said Chavez. “Small improvements around the office, such as better equipment, food and drinks, can make a big difference in workers’ morale. After all it is often the little things in life that tend to make people the happiest.”

Source: Accounting Principals; www.accountingprincipals.com.

West Virginia income tax exemption for state law enforcement retirees unlawfully discriminated against retired federal marshal

February 22nd, 2019

By Ronald Miller, J.D.
A West Virginia statute that provided a tax exemption for state law enforcement officers when they retired, but did not apply to federal law enforcement personnel, unlawfully discriminated against a retired U.S. marshal.
A state violates the intergovernmental tax immunity doctrine when it treats retired state employees more favorably than retired federal employees [Read more...]


Union members who authorized dues deductions can’t claim First Amendment violations after Janus

February 22nd, 2019

By Harold S. Berman J.D.
Union members who agreed to dues deduction as stipulated by state law and a collective bargaining agreement could not later claim that the state and the union deprived them of their First Amendments rights. They were not coerced into agreeing to the deductions.
Union members who brought a class action against the [Read more...]


No support for allegation employee was fired for reporting ‘assault’ by coworker

February 22nd, 2019

By Kathleen Kapusta, J.D.
The company claimed it fired the employee because of his history of workplace conflict and disrespect for his coworkers and his supervisor, the court observed, noting that when a worker is fired for impugning the company’s integrity, the discharge does not violate public policy.
Affirming summary judgment against an employee’s state-law retaliatory discharge [Read more...]


Pregnant EMT let go after being denied desk job can pursue PDA claim

February 22nd, 2019

By Nicole D. Prysby, J.D.
The employee was denied a position where she would not have to do heavy lifting and was told she was being “let go” but could return after her pregnancy leave.
Given evidence that a pregnant EMT was terminated and did not take leave voluntarily, a federal district court in Illinois permitted her [Read more...]


Only FMLA interference claim is revived for intelligence analyst denied permanent post due to attendance problems

February 21st, 2019

By Lisa Milam, J.D.
In a somewhat narrow FMLA interference win, the appeals court grappled with a number of salient disability and accommodation issues before also affirming summary judgment in the agency’s favor on her Rehabilitation Act claims.
An operations analyst may pursue her FMLA interference claims against the Office of the National Intelligence Director (ODNI), the [Read more...]