About Us  |  About Cheetah®  |  Contact Us

Survey finds American workers spend an average of $3000 a year on coffee and lunch at work

American workers spend an alarmingly high amount of their hard earned cash on somewhat average daily expenses, according to a new Workonomix survey by Accounting Principals. The survey found that 50 percent of the American workforce spends approximately $1000 a year on coffee, or a weekly coffee habit of more than $20. And the spending doesn’t stop there. Two thirds (66 percent) of working Americans buy their lunch instead of packing it, costing them an average of $37 per week — nearly $2,000 a year.

Despite these high costs, the survey suggests workers are unclear about the biggest drain to their wallet. When asked which work expense they most want to be reimbursed for by their employer, 42 percent of employees chose commuting costs and only 11 percent chose lunch expenses. However, the average American’s commuting cost is $123 a month or approximately $1500 a year, which is well below the average annual lunch tab of $2000.

“Small — but consistent — expenses add up quickly over time, and it can be difficult for consumers to realize it because they’re only spending a few dollars at a time. But, as our survey shows, those few dollars can quickly turn into a few thousand dollars,” said Jodi Chavez, senior vice president, Accounting Principals. “Additionally, when you look at it over a worker’s lifetime, that number grows exponentially. Consider the average American who works for about 40 years, starting their first job around age 22. By the time they retire at age 62 they would have spent at minimum $120,000 on coffee and lunch, not including inflation.”

This is especially true for young American workers. The survey found that younger professionals (ages 18-34) spend almost twice as much on coffee during the week than those ages 45+ ($24.74 vs. $14.15, respectively). They also shell out more for lunch, spending an average of $44.78 per week on lunch compared to their older colleagues who spend $31.80 per week. However, it seems American workers of all ages are starting to realize the effect this incremental spending has on their personal bottom line. According to the survey, one-third (35 percent) of employees have made it a financial goal to bring lunch instead of buying it in 2012.

Other survey findings include:

  • Better food and coffee in the office might help cut back personal spending. Perhaps because of how much they’re spending outside the office, American workers would like companies to invest in better food and drinks in the office. One-quarter (25 percent) of Americans wish their company would invest in better vending machine snacks and 22 percent of American workers would like their company to invest in better coffee in the office.
  • Employers should focus on the “simple pleasures” to keep employees happy. Although better food and drinks would be a plus, employees most want to see their companies invest in better office equipment (46 percent) and more comfortable office chairs (32 percent) in 2012.
  • Corporate discounts do not factor into employees’ purchase decisions. Companies looking to attract new candidates shouldn’t focus on corporate discounts as a selling point. The majority (82 percent) of employees say corporate discounts matter little or not at all when buying a new product or service.

“As the recovery gains momentum and companies look to attract and retain talent, they should consider worrying less about big-ticket discounts and focus instead on what will impact their employees’ happiness every day,” said Chavez. “Small improvements around the office, such as better equipment, food and drinks, can make a big difference in workers’ morale. After all it is often the little things in life that tend to make people the happiest.”

Source: Accounting Principals; www.accountingprincipals.com.

No whistleblower ‘carve-out’: Assistant principal’s disagreement over student discipline not constitutionally protected speech

October 23rd, 2019

By Marjorie Johnson, J.D.
Her speech fell within her official duties, which included administering discipline. The appeals court again refused to recognize a “whistleblower carve-out” to this Garcetti principle.
An assistant principal who claimed she was forced to resign after she voiced opposition to the superintendent’s decision to allow an adult student to possess cigarettes at school [Read more...]


In-person, regular attendance was essential function of auditor’s job, so her IBS-related ADA and FMLA claims fail

October 22nd, 2019

By Marjorie Johnson, J.D.
Even if the employee’s irritable bowel syndrome had actually caused all of her tardiness, early departure, excessive break-taking, and full-day absences, she required “vastly more flexibility and time off than she proposed” and could not establish that she remained qualified for her job.
An employee who suffered from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and [Read more...]


Pepperidge Farm to pay over $22.7M in approved independent contractor misclassification settlement

October 22nd, 2019

By Lisa Milam, J.D.
The court granted preliminary approval but has continued misgivings about the appropriateness of $25,000 incentive awards to seven named plaintiffs.
A federal district court in California has granted preliminary approval to a $22.7 million settlement agreement resolving claims that Pepperidge Farm misclassified its product distributors as independent contractors. The class of roughly 925 [Read more...]


Workforce Mobility Act would curb employers’ use of non-compete agreements

October 22nd, 2019

By Wayne D. Garris Jr., J.D.
The bipartisan bill would limit the use of non-compete agreements to the dissolution of partnerships or the sale of a business.
On October 16, Senators Todd Young (R-Ind.) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) introduced a bill that would limit the use of non-compete agreements by employers. The bill, according to Senator Young, [Read more...]


NLRB: Cooperative that exercised control over scope of supermarkets’ initial workforce was a joint employer

October 21st, 2019

By Ronald Miller, J.D.
Applying the Browning-Ferris standard, the Board found the cooperative exercised direct and immediate control over essential terms and conditions of employment of the individual stores’ employees.
Because a cooperative had significant control over the scope and identity of the initial workforce of newly purchased individual supermarkets, and referred to itself as an “employer” [Read more...]